Heap vs Indicative: Analytics Comparison (2026)

An independent side-by-side comparison of Heap and Indicative for analytics buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.

AI Citation Scorecard

How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask analytics questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.

Too early to call — probes still building data.
ChatGPT
Heap
70 / 102 probes
69%
Excellent
Indicative
Tracking…
No data yet
Perplexity
Heap
81 / 101 probes
80%
Excellent
Indicative
Tracking…
No data yet
Gemini
Heap
79 / 101 probes
78%
Excellent
Indicative
Tracking…
No data yet
Claude
Heap
66 / 102 probes
65%
Excellent
Indicative
Tracking…
No data yet
Copilot
Heap
303 / 594 probes
51%
Excellent
Indicative
Tracking…
No data yet
Scale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent

Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.

Pricing

Heap
Starting price
—
Free tier
Yes
heap.io ↗
Indicative
Starting price
—
Free tier
—
indicative.com ↗

Key Features

Heap
  • ✓Core analytics charts
  • ✓Unlimited enrichment sources
  • ✓6 months data history
  • ✓SSO
Indicative

Feature data is being indexed.

When to choose Heap

Choose Heap if your team prioritizes its strengths over Indicative's. Full guidance populates as Heap's feature data is indexed.

When to choose Indicative

Choose Indicative if your team prioritizes its strengths over Heap's. Full guidance populates as Indicative's feature data is indexed.

AI visibility profiles

Is one of these your brand?

Get the full report by email: every analytics buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.

Heap

heap.io

Indicative

indicative.com

Free check

Check any brand's AI visibility — free

We ask the buyer questions in this market across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot, and show you who gets named.

More Analytics Comparisons