Athena HQ vs Conductor: AI Visibility & GEO Comparison (2026)
Athena HQ and Conductor both offer AI-powered visibility solutions with free tiers, but differentiate in their core feature sets and pricing models.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask ai visibility & geo questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓Unlimited users
- ✓Visibility across 11 models
- ✓Unlimited Topics and Prompts
- ✓Unlimited Competitors
- ✓Content recommendations
- ✓API access available as add-on
- ✓Data export to CSV
- ✓Self-learning content improvement
Feature data is being indexed.
When to choose Athena HQ
Athena HQ is suitable for users prioritizing direct AI integration like ChatGPT and a dedicated AI agent, alongside self-learning content improvement and unlimited members. It provides API access as an add-on and integrates with platforms like Shopify and Webflow. It has a stated starting price and includes 3,600 credits.
When to choose Conductor
Conductor is suitable for users focused on AI Content Generation, AEO + SEO Reporting, and extensive website and page monitoring. It offers custom development options and integrates with Adobe Analytics. Conductor emphasizes flexible usage-based pricing and scalable solutions for enterprises, though its pricing and entry-level plans are not explicitly stated.
Frequently Asked Questions
AI visibility profiles
Is one of these your brand?
Get the full report by email: every ai visibility & geo buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.