Cisco Umbrella vs Perimeter 81: SASE / SSE Comparison (2026)

Cisco Umbrella and Perimeter 81 both offer SASE/SSE platforms, but they differentiate in their core focus and specific features. Cisco Umbrella highlights its industry-leading DNS security and comprehensive threat protection, while Perimeter 81 emphasizes Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) and a broader range of security features like SWG and CASB.

AI Citation Scorecard

How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask sase / sse questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.

Too early to call — probes still building data.
ChatGPT
Cisco Umbrella
Tracking…
No data yet
Perimeter 81
Tracking…
No data yet
Perplexity
Cisco Umbrella
0 / 1 probes
0%
Invisible
Perimeter 81
0 / 1 probes
0%
Invisible
Gemini
Cisco Umbrella
Tracking…
No data yet
Perimeter 81
Tracking…
No data yet
Claude
Cisco Umbrella
Tracking…
No data yet
Perimeter 81
Tracking…
No data yet
Copilot
Cisco Umbrella
Tracking…
No data yet
Perimeter 81
Tracking…
No data yet
Scale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent

Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella
Starting price
—
Free tier
Yes
umbrella.com ↗
Perimeter 81
Starting price
—
Free tier
—
perimeter81.com ↗

Key Features

Cisco Umbrella
  • ✓Industry-leading DNS security
  • ✓Robust DNS security + more
  • ✓Secure Internet Access (SIA)
  • ✓Security Service Edge (SSE)
Perimeter 81
  • ✓Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
  • ✓Secure Web Gateway (SWG)
  • ✓Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)
  • ✓10x faster browsing
  • ✓Identity-centric zero trust access policy
  • ✓Auto-steering based on link health
  • ✓Multi-layer security
  • ✓AI-based anomaly detection

When to choose Cisco Umbrella

Cisco Umbrella is more suitable for organizations prioritizing robust DNS security and a straightforward, easy-to-manage platform for threat protection. Its focus on DNS security and secure internet access makes it a strong contender for foundational security needs and a zero-trust approach.

When to choose Perimeter 81

Perimeter 81 is a strong option for organizations looking for a comprehensive SASE solution with a strong emphasis on Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). Its inclusion of Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), and AI-based anomaly detection, along with features like 10x faster browsing and auto-steering based on link health, cater to those seeking an all-in-one platform with advanced security and performance capabilities for remote access scenarios.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences in security features?
Cisco Umbrella emphasizes industry-leading DNS security and general robust DNS security, along with Secure Internet Access (SIA) and Security Service Edge (SSE). Perimeter 81, conversely, offers a broader suite including Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), multi-layer security, and AI-based anomaly detection.
Which vendor offers a free tier?
Cisco Umbrella offers a free tier, whereas Perimeter 81 does not mention a free tier.
What are the performance-related features offered?
Perimeter 81 offers features like '10x faster browsing' and 'auto-steering based on link health'. Cisco Umbrella does not list specific performance-related features.
Do both vendors support a zero-trust approach?
Cisco Umbrella supports a zero-trust approach. Perimeter 81 offers Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) and identity-centric zero trust access policy.

AI visibility profiles

Is one of these your brand?

Get the full report by email: every sase / sse buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.

Cisco Umbrella

umbrella.com

Perimeter 81

perimeter81.com

Free check

Check any brand's AI visibility — free

We ask the buyer questions in this market across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot, and show you who gets named.

More SASE / SSE Comparisons