Cobalt vs Intigriti: Pentesting & Offensive Security Comparison (2026)
Cobalt and Intigriti both offer pentesting and offensive security solutions. Cobalt focuses on DAST, customizable reports, and a customer success team, while Intigriti provides private and public bug bounty programs, VDP, and community management.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask pentesting & offensive security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓SAML-Based SSO
- ✓User and Group Access Controls
- ✓Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
- ✓customizable reports
- ✓Insights Dashboard
- ✓Customer success team
- ✓Free retesting
- ✓Credit rollover
- ✓Private & public bug bounty
- ✓Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP)
- ✓Community management
- ✓Attack surface mapping
- ✓Native Slack & Jira integration
- ✓Custom reporting
- ✓Researcher proxy
- ✓Live hacking event option
When to choose Cobalt
Cobalt is suitable for organizations that require DAST, user and group access controls, and a dedicated customer success team. Its model includes free retesting and credit rollover.
When to choose Intigriti
Intigriti is a good fit for organizations interested in private and public bug bounty programs, vulnerability disclosure programs, and attack surface mapping. It also offers native Slack and Jira integration and the option for live hacking events.
Frequently Asked Questions
AI visibility profiles
Is one of these your brand?
Get the full report by email: every pentesting & offensive security buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.
cobalt.io
intigriti.com