Raygun vs TrackJS: Error Tracking Comparison (2026)
Raygun and TrackJS are both error tracking platforms. Raygun offers unlimited applications and AI Error Resolution, while TrackJS focuses on page views and unlimited users with a fixed number of applications and data retention.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask error tracking questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓Unlimited apps
- ✓Alerts via email, Slack
- ✓Spike protection
- ✓Categorisation & priorities
- ✓Advanced search & filters
- ✓Deployment tracking
- ✓Audit log
- ✓AI Error Resolution
- ✓100K monthly page views
- ✓Unlimited users
- ✓1 application
- ✓10 days data retention
- ✓800,000+ errors per month
- ✓Errors monitored: 800,000+
- ✓Alert channels: 3
- ✓Inbound ignore rules: Unlimited
When to choose Raygun
You need unlimited applications, AI-powered error resolution, deployment tracking, and a built-in audit log. Raygun also provides specific integrations with Slack, Teams, GitHub, and Jira, and offers a free tier.
When to choose TrackJS
You prioritize predictable pricing based on page views, need to monitor a large number of errors (800,000+) for a single application, and require unlimited users. TrackJS offers unlimited inbound ignore rules.
Frequently Asked Questions
AI visibility profiles
Is one of these your brand?
Get the full report by email: every error tracking buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.
raygun.com
trackjs.com