Mezmo (formerly LogDNA) vs TrackJS: Error Tracking Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Mezmo (formerly LogDNA) and TrackJS for error tracking buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask error tracking questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Feature data is being indexed.
- ✓100K monthly page views
- ✓Unlimited users
- ✓1 application
- ✓10 days data retention
- ✓800,000+ errors per month
- ✓Errors monitored: 800,000+
- ✓Alert channels: 3
- ✓Inbound ignore rules: Unlimited
When to choose Mezmo (formerly LogDNA)
Choose Mezmo (formerly LogDNA) if your team prioritizes its strengths over TrackJS's. Full guidance populates as Mezmo (formerly LogDNA)'s feature data is indexed.
When to choose TrackJS
Choose TrackJS if your team prioritizes its strengths over Mezmo (formerly LogDNA)'s. Full guidance populates as TrackJS's feature data is indexed.
AI visibility profiles
Is one of these your brand?
Get the full report by email: every error tracking buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.
mezmo.com
trackjs.com