Agari vs Cofense: Email Security Comparison (2026)
Agari and Cofense both offer AI-powered email security, but they differ in their specific features and focuses. Agari provides a broader suite of email security features, including DMARC policy management, real-time email archiving, and email encryption options. Cofense, on the other hand, emphasizes human-validated threat intelligence and improving Security Operations Center (SOC) efficiency.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask email security questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓AI and threat intelligence integration
- ✓Automated email threat response
- ✓DMARC policy management
- ✓Spam and phishing protection
- ✓Real-time email archiving
- ✓Email encryption options
- ✓Adaptive security measures
- ✓Advanced threat inspection
- ✓AI-driven campaign detection
- ✓Human-validated threat intelligence
- ✓Automatic quarantine of threats
- ✓Improves SOC efficiency
When to choose Agari
Agari is suitable for organizations seeking a comprehensive email security platform with features like DMARC policy management, real-time archiving, and email encryption, alongside AI and threat intelligence for automated threat response. It integrates with Microsoft 365, Microsoft Exchange, and Google Workspace.
When to choose Cofense
Cofense is suitable for organizations prioritizing AI-driven campaign detection and human-validated threat intelligence, aiming to automatically quarantine threats and improve SOC efficiency. It focuses on effective phishing campaign remediation and improving employee resilience through training.
Frequently Asked Questions
AI visibility profiles
Is one of these your brand?
Get the full report by email: every email security buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.
agari.com
cofense.com