Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine: AI Coding Assistants Comparison (2026)
An independent side-by-side comparison of Sourcegraph Cody and Tabnine for ai coding assistants buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask ai coding assistants questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
Feature data is being indexed.
- ✓AI code completions for current and multiple lines
- ✓AI chat support in the IDE
- ✓Flexible SaaS, VPC, and on-premises deployment
- ✓Zero code retention and total privacy
- ✓End-to-end encryption and TLS
- ✓Supports all major IDEs and programming languages
- ✓Centralized analytics for cost and compliance
- ✓Priority ticket-based support during business hours
When to choose Sourcegraph Cody
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if your team prioritizes its strengths over Tabnine's. Full guidance populates as Sourcegraph Cody's feature data is indexed.
When to choose Tabnine
Choose Tabnine if your team prioritizes its strengths over Sourcegraph Cody's. Full guidance populates as Tabnine's feature data is indexed.
AI visibility profiles
Is one of these your brand?
Get the full report by email: every ai coding assistants buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.
sourcegraph.com/cody
tabnine.com