Continue vs Magic: AI Coding Assistants Comparison (2026)

An independent side-by-side comparison of Continue and Magic for ai coding assistants buyers — pricing, features, integrations, and how often each is cited by major AI engines.

AI Citation Scorecard

How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask ai coding assistants questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.

Too early to call — probes still building data.
ChatGPT
Continue
0 / 1 probes
0%
Invisible
Magic
Tracking…
No data yet
Perplexity
Continue
0 / 1 probes
0%
Invisible
Magic
Tracking…
No data yet
Gemini
Continue
0 / 1 probes
0%
Invisible
Magic
Tracking…
No data yet
Claude
Continue
0 / 1 probes
0%
Invisible
Magic
Tracking…
No data yet
Copilot
Continue
0 / 1 probes
0%
Invisible
Magic
Tracking…
No data yet
Scale:NoneLowFairStrongExcellent

Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.

Pricing

Continue
Starting price
—
Free tier
—
continue.dev ↗
Magic
Starting price
—
Free tier
—
magic.inc ↗

Key Features

Continue

Feature data is being indexed.

Magic

Feature data is being indexed.

When to choose Continue

Choose Continue if your team prioritizes its strengths over Magic's. Full guidance populates as Continue's feature data is indexed.

When to choose Magic

Choose Magic if your team prioritizes its strengths over Continue's. Full guidance populates as Magic's feature data is indexed.

AI visibility profiles

Is one of these your brand?

Get the full report by email: every ai coding assistants buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.

Continue

continue.dev

Magic

magic.inc

Free check

Check any brand's AI visibility — free

We ask the buyer questions in this market across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot, and show you who gets named.

More AI Coding Assistants Comparisons