Amazon Q Developer vs Cursor: AI Coding Assistants Comparison (2026)
Amazon Q Developer and Cursor both offer AI coding assistants with free tiers and paid plans. While Amazon Q Developer emphasizes support for Java and .NET and includes security features, Cursor highlights access to frontier models and advanced team management capabilities like centralized billing and usage analytics.
AI Citation Scorecard
How often each is cited by major AI engines when buyers ask ai coding assistants questions. Last 90 days across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot.
Probes run hourly; each (engine × query) combo retests every ~3 days.
Pricing
Key Features
- ✓Advanced capabilities at zero cost
- ✓Includes 50 agentic requests
- ✓4k lines of code per user for Pro
- ✓Admin dashboard for Pro users
- ✓No credit card required
- ✓Limited Agent requests
- ✓Extended limits on Agent
- ✓Access to frontier models
- ✓Centralized team billing
- ✓Team marketplace for skills
- ✓Usage analytics to understand behavior
- ✓Audit logs and service accounts
When to choose Amazon Q Developer
You need an AI coding assistant with strong support for Java and .NET, built-in security features, and an admin dashboard for Pro users. You are comfortable with a per-user pricing model that can scale.
When to choose Cursor
You need an AI coding assistant that provides access to frontier AI models, robust team management features including centralized billing and usage analytics, and advanced security options like SAML/OIDC SSO and audit logs. You value flexibility in billing and a marketplace for team skills.
Frequently Asked Questions
AI visibility profiles
Is one of these your brand?
Get the full report by email: every ai coding assistants buyer question we ask, which engines name you, and who gets named instead.
aws.amazon.com/q/developer
cursor.com