Vulnerability Management Vendors Losing in AI Search

12 vulnerability management brands that ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini aren't citing when real buyers ask — last 90 days. How we measure this.

#VendorLoss rate
1
Nucleus Security
nucleussec.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim Nucleus Security
2
Edgescan
edgescan.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim Edgescan
3
ProjectDiscovery
projectdiscovery.io
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim ProjectDiscovery
4
Brinqa
brinqa.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim Brinqa
5
Holm Security
holmsecurity.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim Holm Security
6
Outpost24
outpost24.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim Outpost24
7
NopSec
nopsec.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim NopSec
8
Pentera
pentera.io
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim Pentera
9
Vulcan Cyber
vulcan.io
1/31 probes cited
97%Claim Vulcan Cyber
10
Intruder
intruder.io
1/31 probes cited
97%Claim Intruder
11
Snyk
snyk.io
5/31 probes cited
84%Claim Snyk
12
Greenbone
greenbone.net
7/31 probes cited
77%Claim Greenbone

Is your brand on this list — or about to be?

Drop your work email and we'll send your own citation rate across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot, the buyer questions you're losing, and who's quoted instead.

Or run a free visibility check and see it on screen in about a minute.

What "losing" means here

We run real buyer-intent queries (like "best vulnerability management software") against ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini on a rolling schedule. A vendor is "losing" when it's cited in fewer than 40% of its probes and has at least 5 probes on record. If you represent one of these brands, claim your listing to see the full list of losing queries and start weekly monitoring.