Pentesting & Offensive Security Vendors Losing in AI Search

11 pentesting & offensive security brands that ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini aren't citing when real buyers ask — last 90 days. How we measure this.

#VendorLoss rate
1
Picus Security
picussecurity.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim Picus Security
2
SafeBreach
safebreach.com
0/31 probes cited
100%Claim SafeBreach
3
NetSPI
netspi.com
1/31 probes cited
97%Claim NetSPI
4
XM Cyber
xmcyber.com
1/31 probes cited
97%Claim XM Cyber
5
Horizon3.ai
horizon3.ai
1/31 probes cited
97%Claim Horizon3.ai
6
Astra Security
getastra.com
1/31 probes cited
97%Claim Astra Security
7
AttackIQ
attackiq.com
2/31 probes cited
94%Claim AttackIQ
8
Pentera
pentera.io
3/31 probes cited
90%Claim Pentera
9
YesWeHack
yeswehack.com
5/31 probes cited
84%Claim YesWeHack
10
Detectify
detectify.com
6/31 probes cited
81%Claim Detectify
11
Intigriti
intigriti.com
7/31 probes cited
77%Claim Intigriti

Is your brand on this list — or about to be?

Drop your work email and we'll send your own citation rate across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Copilot, the buyer questions you're losing, and who's quoted instead.

Or run a free visibility check and see it on screen in about a minute.

What "losing" means here

We run real buyer-intent queries (like "best pentesting & offensive security software") against ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini on a rolling schedule. A vendor is "losing" when it's cited in fewer than 40% of its probes and has at least 5 probes on record. If you represent one of these brands, claim your listing to see the full list of losing queries and start weekly monitoring.