Pentesting & Offensive Security Vendors Losing in AI Search

11 pentesting & offensive security brands that ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini aren't citing when real buyers ask — last 90 days. How we measure this.

#VendorLoss rate
1
Picus Security
picussecurity.com
0/30 probes cited
100%Claim Picus Security
2
SafeBreach
safebreach.com
0/30 probes cited
100%Claim SafeBreach
3
NetSPI
netspi.com
1/30 probes cited
97%Claim NetSPI
4
XM Cyber
xmcyber.com
1/30 probes cited
97%Claim XM Cyber
5
Horizon3.ai
horizon3.ai
1/30 probes cited
97%Claim Horizon3.ai
6
Astra Security
getastra.com
1/30 probes cited
97%Claim Astra Security
7
AttackIQ
attackiq.com
2/30 probes cited
93%Claim AttackIQ
8
Pentera
pentera.io
3/30 probes cited
90%Claim Pentera
9
YesWeHack
yeswehack.com
5/30 probes cited
83%Claim YesWeHack
10
Detectify
detectify.com
5/30 probes cited
83%Claim Detectify
11
Intigriti
intigriti.com
6/30 probes cited
80%Claim Intigriti

What "losing" means here

We run real buyer-intent queries (like "best pentesting & offensive security software") against ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini on a rolling schedule. A vendor is "losing" when it's cited in fewer than 40% of its probes and has at least 5 probes on record. If you represent one of these brands, claim your listing to see the full list of losing queries and start weekly monitoring.