Eyewear Vendors Losing in AI Search
11 eyewear brands that ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini aren't citing when real buyers ask — last 90 days. How we measure this.
| # | Vendor | Loss rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liingo Eyewear liingoeyewear.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim Liingo Eyewear |
| 2 | Felix Gray felixgrayglasses.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim Felix Gray |
| 3 | Pair Eyewear paireyewear.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim Pair Eyewear |
| 4 | Classic Specs classicspecs.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim Classic Specs |
| 5 | MVMT mvmt.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim MVMT |
| 6 | Quay Australia quayaustralia.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim Quay Australia |
| 7 | Oakley oakley.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim Oakley |
| 8 | Moscot moscot.com 0/30 probes cited | 100% | Claim Moscot |
| 9 | Lensabl lensabl.com 1/30 probes cited | 97% | Claim Lensabl |
| 10 | Ray-Ban ray-ban.com 2/30 probes cited | 93% | Claim Ray-Ban |
| 11 | Persol persol.com 2/30 probes cited | 93% | Claim Persol |
What "losing" means here
We run real buyer-intent queries (like "best eyewear software") against ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini on a rolling schedule. A vendor is "losing" when it's cited in fewer than 40% of its probes and has at least 5 probes on record. If you represent one of these brands, claim your listing to see the full list of losing queries and start weekly monitoring.